3d finite element (fe) model implemented using the comsol multiphysics software package Search Results


3d multiphase model  (COMSOL Inc)
90
COMSOL Inc 3d multiphase model
3d Multiphase Model, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+finite+element+%28fe%29+model+implemented+using+the+comsol+multiphysics+software+package/10__1016_slash_j__jaecs__2024__100249-103-1-11?v=COMSOL+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d multiphase model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
comsol multiphysics 5.2a  (COMSOL Inc)
90
COMSOL Inc comsol multiphysics 5.2a
Comsol Multiphysics 5.2a, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+finite+element+%28fe%29+model+implemented+using+the+comsol+multiphysics+software+package/10__3390_slash_en13195219-94-13-12?v=COMSOL+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
comsol multiphysics 5.2a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
3d multiphysics model  (COMSOL Inc)
90
COMSOL Inc 3d multiphysics model
The graphs display the predictions of a <t>multiphysics</t> model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
3d Multiphysics Model, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+finite+element+%28fe%29+model+implemented+using+the+comsol+multiphysics+software+package/pmc08913829-53-14-19?v=COMSOL+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d multiphysics model - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
3d laminar flow model in comsol multiphysics 4.1  (COMSOL Inc)
90
COMSOL Inc 3d laminar flow model in comsol multiphysics 4.1
The graphs display the predictions of a <t>multiphysics</t> model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
3d Laminar Flow Model In Comsol Multiphysics 4.1, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+finite+element+%28fe%29+model+implemented+using+the+comsol+multiphysics+software+package/10__1039_slash_c6an00567e-84-18-17?v=COMSOL+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d laminar flow model in comsol multiphysics 4.1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
3d finite element modeling comsol multiphysics  (COMSOL Inc)
90
COMSOL Inc 3d finite element modeling comsol multiphysics
The graphs display the predictions of a <t>multiphysics</t> model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
3d Finite Element Modeling Comsol Multiphysics, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+finite+element+%28fe%29+model+implemented+using+the+comsol+multiphysics+software+package/pmc05191004-49-16-20?v=COMSOL+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d finite element modeling comsol multiphysics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
3d modeling comsol multiphysics v4.3a  (COMSOL Inc)
90
COMSOL Inc 3d modeling comsol multiphysics v4.3a
The graphs display the predictions of a <t>multiphysics</t> model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
3d Modeling Comsol Multiphysics V4.3a, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+finite+element+%28fe%29+model+implemented+using+the+comsol+multiphysics+software+package/pmc04737954-62-6-5?v=COMSOL+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d modeling comsol multiphysics v4.3a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
multiphysics  (COMSOL Inc)
90
COMSOL Inc multiphysics
The graphs display the predictions of a <t>multiphysics</t> model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
Multiphysics, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+finite+element+%28fe%29+model+implemented+using+the+comsol+multiphysics+software+package/pmc06424108-112-15-14?v=COMSOL+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
multiphysics - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
full-wave 3d finite element (fe) frequency domain simulations  (COMSOL Inc)
90
COMSOL Inc full-wave 3d finite element (fe) frequency domain simulations
The graphs display the predictions of a <t>multiphysics</t> model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
Full Wave 3d Finite Element (Fe) Frequency Domain Simulations, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+finite+element+%28fe%29+model+implemented+using+the+comsol+multiphysics+software+package/10__1021_slash_nl403253c-26-23-32?v=COMSOL+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
full-wave 3d finite element (fe) frequency domain simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
3d model comsol multiphysics 5.5  (COMSOL Inc)
90
COMSOL Inc 3d model comsol multiphysics 5.5
The graphs display the predictions of a <t>multiphysics</t> model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
3d Model Comsol Multiphysics 5.5, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+finite+element+%28fe%29+model+implemented+using+the+comsol+multiphysics+software+package/pm36959258-209-7-9?v=COMSOL+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d model comsol multiphysics 5.5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
femlabtm 3d multiphysics modeling and simulation software  (COMSOL Inc)
90
COMSOL Inc femlabtm 3d multiphysics modeling and simulation software
The graphs display the predictions of a <t>multiphysics</t> model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
Femlabtm 3d Multiphysics Modeling And Simulation Software, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+finite+element+%28fe%29+model+implemented+using+the+comsol+multiphysics+software+package/us07701143-253-45-54?v=COMSOL+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
femlabtm 3d multiphysics modeling and simulation software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
3d helmholtz solver  (COMSOL Inc)
90
COMSOL Inc 3d helmholtz solver
The graphs display the predictions of a <t>multiphysics</t> model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
3d Helmholtz Solver, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+finite+element+%28fe%29+model+implemented+using+the+comsol+multiphysics+software+package/10__1016_slash_j__jaecs__2024__100260-259-1-4?v=COMSOL+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d helmholtz solver - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
3d numerical simulation  (COMSOL Inc)
90
COMSOL Inc 3d numerical simulation
The graphs display the predictions of a <t>multiphysics</t> model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.
3d Numerical Simulation, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+finite+element+%28fe%29+model+implemented+using+the+comsol+multiphysics+software+package/10__1364_slash_oe__23__027763-349-8-11?v=COMSOL+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d numerical simulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


The graphs display the predictions of a multiphysics model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Production of a monolithic fuel cell stack with high power density

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28970-w

Figure Lengend Snippet: The graphs display the predictions of a multiphysics model on the pressure built-up inside the SRU monoliths (black lines/symbols) during the debinding step (red lines). Below the graphs, the photographs show the integrity of the corresponding SRU monoliths after heat treatment (debinding and sintering steps). a , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only graphite as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, b , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using a 50–50 vol.% mixture of graphite–PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels, and c , Case of a SRU monolith manufactured using only PMMA as sacrificial material to form the gas channels. The SRU presented in Fig. 2c reveals large cracks after debinding/sintering steps which is in good accordance with the model which predicted that SRU monolith manufactured using 100% PMMA would lead to the highest pressure (14 mbar around 200 °C) among the three pore-forming agents investigated, and therefore will be the most likely to fracture. Note that both PMMA and graphite are also contained the electrode tapes which explains why a pressure peak corresponding to graphite removal can also be found in the case of Fig. 2c, for example.

Article Snippet: The gas channel dimensions (250 × 500 μm 2 ) are studied via a 3D multiphysics model built in COMSOL Multiphysics and optimised to obtain a tolerable pressure drop.

Techniques: